VNQ vs. DIV
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.65%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for DIV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
VNQ vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 5.65%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
VNQ vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 12.51% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and DIV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.68 |
The correlation between VNQ and DIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
VNQ vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQ
DIV
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
-
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
VNQ
DIV
Basic Materials
VNQ
DIV
Communication Services
VNQ
DIV
Technology
VNQ
DIV
-
Energy
VNQ
DIV
Financial Services
VNQ
DIV
Industrials
VNQ
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
VNQ
-
DIV
Consumer Defensive
VNQ
-
DIV
Healthcare
VNQ
-
DIV
Utilities
VNQ
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
DIV
VNQ vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNQ | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.26 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.02 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 8.43 | -3.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -52.74% | -20.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -5.23% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -12.33% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -21.14% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -52.74% | +10.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.73% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -7.01% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 1.88% | +0.77% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.07%. This indicates that VNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 3.07% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 7.08% | +2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 10.32% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 13.69% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 17.98% | +2.74% |
VNQ vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNQ vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than DIV's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.54% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and DIV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNQ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, VNQ leads with 5.65% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VNQ has performed better with a 5.65% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 3.54% for VNQ.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.45% for DIV.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer