VNMC vs. BMVP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VNMC (Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF) and BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. VNMC is actively managed, while BMVP is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNMC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BMVP.

Performance

VNMC vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VNMC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMVP

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 5.85%
• 6M: 6.04%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 6.10%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNMC vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	10.34%	16.92%	-10.74%	21.59%	19.05%
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	5.85%	6.15%	17.46%	19.03%	-16.01%	19.38%	13.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VNMC and BMVP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020	0.71

The correlation between VNMC and BMVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNMC vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VNMC	BMVP
Industrials	24.0%	16.8%
Financial Services	16.9%	16.4%
Technology	15.6%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	10.6%
Basic Materials	10.2%	1.6%
Healthcare	7.6%	9.7%
Energy	5.9%	5.2%
Real Estate	4.6%	5.5%
Communication Services	2.0%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	5.1%
Utilities	0.7%	5.1%

Return for Risk

VNMC vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP

BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 25
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNMC vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VNMC	BMVP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.11	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	VNMC	BMVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-78.13%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.37%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-36.21%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VNMC	BMVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	9.75%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.07%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.81%	—

VNMC vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNMC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VNMC vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison

VNMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	1.68%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	1.08%	4.30%	10.12%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNMC and BMVP in my portfolio?

VNMC and BMVP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VNMC or BMVP?

On fees, BMVP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNMC or BMVP?

BMVP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VNMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNMC or BMVP?

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.00% for VNMC.

What is the main difference between VNMC and BMVP?

They also come from different issuers: Groupe BPCE and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VNMC and 0.29% for BMVP.