VNM vs. DCMT
VNM (VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MVIS Vietnam Index, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. VNM is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. Over the past year, VNM returned 9.95% vs 30.61% for DCMT. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. VNM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.
Performance
VNM vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNM achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 26.14% return.
VNM
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- 6M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- -1.14%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.96%
DCMT
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- 6M
- 20.26%
- YTD
- 26.14%
- 1Y
- 30.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $312.97K | $269.09K | $196.68K | |
| $13.14M | $11.75M | $11.73M |
VNM vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF | -8.28% | 66.55% | -9.61% |
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 26.14% | 6.04% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNM and DCMT is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | -0.07 |
The correlation between VNM and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNM vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank
VNM
DCMT
VNM vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNM | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.28 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 1.93 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 6.43 | -5.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNM vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNM drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNM and DCMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNM | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.19% | -15.96% | -47.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | -15.96% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.57% | -9.46% | -19.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.73% | -3.62% | -34.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.98% | 4.78% | +3.20% |
Volatility
VNM vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) at 5.66%. This indicates that VNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNM | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 5.66% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.63% | 17.01% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.88% | 19.04% | +7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 16.05% | +8.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 16.05% | +7.48% |
VNM vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNM vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison
VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than DCMT's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.91% | 3.67% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 5.21% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.40% | 0.76% | 0.83% | 1.14% | 2.44% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNM and DCMT have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNM has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to DCMT (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNM dropped -63.19% vs DCMT's -15.96%.
On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 30.61% vs 9.95% for VNM. On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, DCMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 30.61% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for VNM.
DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.22% for VNM.
VNM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for VNM and 0.66% for DCMT.
DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNM and DCMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer