VNLA vs. SCHP
VNLA (Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNLA is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VNLA returned 3.83%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for SCHP. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNLA charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
VNLA vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNLA achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return.
VNLA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
VNLA vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 1.59% | 5.45% | 6.41% | 6.09% | -0.17% | -0.18% | 3.01% | 4.43% | 0.02% | 2.11% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNLA and SCHP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016 | 0.32 |
The correlation between VNLA and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNLA vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
VNLA
SCHP
VNLA vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNLA | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +13.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.56 | 1.25 | +2.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.10 | 2.45 | +8.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 57.09 | 7.41 | +49.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNLA vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNLA drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNLA and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNLA | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -14.26% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.43% | -1.93% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.49% | -4.48% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.76% | -14.26% | +12.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.44% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -3.93% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 0.64% | -0.56% |
Volatility
VNLA vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is 0.15%, while Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that VNLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNLA | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | 1.02% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.46% | 2.24% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 3.30% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.04% | 6.12% | -5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.42% | 5.59% | -4.17% |
VNLA vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNLA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNLA vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
VNLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than SCHP's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 4.77% | 4.84% | 4.97% | 3.95% | 4.35% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 3.13% | 2.43% | 1.79% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNLA and SCHP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHP has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to VNLA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNLA dropped -4.49% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 5-year performance, VNLA leads with 3.83% vs 1.06% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 3.83% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for VNLA.
VNLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 3.99% for SCHP.
VNLA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. VNLA tracks FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for VNLA and 0.03% for SCHP.
VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.54 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNLA and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer