PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNLA vs. JXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNLA vs. JXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNLA achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than JXX's 18.71% return.


VNLA

1D
0.06%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*

JXX

1D
0.44%
1M
10.79%
YTD
18.71%
6M
17.45%
1Y
38.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNLA vs. JXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VNLA and JXX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNLA vs. JXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNLA
VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

JXX
JXX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JXX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
JXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JXX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNLA vs. JXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNLAJXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.58

1.33

+2.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.15

2.15

+9.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.33

6.99

+50.34

VNLA vs. JXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNLA Sharpe Ratio is 7.55, which is higher than the JXX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNLA and JXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNLAJXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55

1.92

+5.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.10

0.94

+1.16

Drawdowns

VNLA vs. JXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNLA drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum JXX drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNLA and JXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNLAJXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-23.73%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-18.02%

+17.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.11%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-5.46%

+5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

5.54%

-5.46%

Volatility

VNLA vs. JXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is 0.18%, while Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that VNLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNLAJXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

6.45%

-6.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.46%

15.62%

-15.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

20.21%

-19.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.04%

24.28%

-23.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.42%

24.28%

-22.86%

VNLA vs. JXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNLA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than JXX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNLA vs. JXX - Dividend Comparison

VNLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than JXX's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JXX
Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF
0.01%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
4.78%4.84%4.97%3.95%4.35%1.67%1.21%3.13%2.43%1.79%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNLA and JXX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JXX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to VNLA (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNLA dropped -4.49% vs JXX's -23.73%.

On 1-year performance, JXX leads with 38.60% vs 4.75% for VNLA. On fees, VNLA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JXX has performed better with a 38.60% return vs 4.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNLA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for JXX.

VNLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 0.01% for JXX.

VNLA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while JXX is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for VNLA and 0.57% for JXX.

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.55 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNLA and JXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer