VNLA vs. JLQD
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD).
VNLA and JLQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VNLA is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2016. JLQD is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 8, 2021. Both VNLA and JLQD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VNLA vs. JLQD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VNLA vs. JLQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 0.57% | 5.45% | 6.41% | 6.09% | -0.17% | -0.18% |
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | -0.63% | 7.77% | 3.21% | 8.76% | -15.99% | -1.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNLA achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than JLQD's -0.63% return.
VNLA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
JLQD
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VNLA vs. JLQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNLA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than JLQD's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VNLA vs. JLQD — Risk / Return Rank
VNLA
JLQD
VNLA vs. JLQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNLA | JLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.55 | 0.86 | +5.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 11.33 | 1.19 | +10.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.14 | 1.17 | +1.97 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.06 | 1.27 | +8.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.83 | 4.28 | +40.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNLA | JLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.55 | 0.86 | +5.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.06 | -0.01 | +2.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between VNLA and JLQD is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VNLA vs. JLQD - Dividend Comparison
VNLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than JLQD's 5.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 4.87% | 4.84% | 4.97% | 3.95% | 4.35% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 3.13% | 2.43% | 1.79% | 0.08% |
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | 5.37% | 5.28% | 5.36% | 3.99% | 2.77% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VNLA vs. JLQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNLA drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum JLQD drawdown of -21.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNLA and JLQD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNLA | JLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -21.17% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.47% | -3.57% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -1.83% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -9.06% | +8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | 1.06% | -0.95% |
Volatility
VNLA vs. JLQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is 0.28%, while Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) has a volatility of 1.97%. This indicates that VNLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VNLA | JLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.28% | 1.97% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.45% | 2.55% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72% | 5.03% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.04% | 6.39% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.44% | 6.39% | -4.95% |