PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNLA vs. JBBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNLA vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNLA achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than JBBB's 1.86% return.


VNLA

1D
0.06%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*

JBBB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.30%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNLA vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
1.49%5.45%6.41%6.09%-0.15%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
1.86%5.43%12.50%17.63%-5.99%

Correlation

The correlation between VNLA and JBBB is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNLA vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNLA
VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNLA vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNLAJBBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.58

1.36

+2.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.15

2.26

+8.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.33

7.66

+49.67

VNLA vs. JBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNLA Sharpe Ratio is 7.55, which is higher than the JBBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNLA and JBBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNLAJBBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55

1.67

+5.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.10

1.30

+0.80

Drawdowns

VNLA vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNLA drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum JBBB drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNLA and JBBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNLAJBBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-10.57%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-2.46%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.49%

-3.82%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-1.58%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.72%

-0.64%

Volatility

VNLA vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is 0.18%, while Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) has a volatility of 0.45%. This indicates that VNLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNLAJBBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

0.45%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.46%

2.76%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

3.34%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.04%

5.26%

-4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.42%

5.26%

-3.84%

VNLA vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNLA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNLA vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison

VNLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than JBBB's 7.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
7.13%8.41%9.24%8.71%5.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
4.78%4.84%4.97%3.95%4.35%1.67%1.21%3.13%2.43%1.79%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNLA and JBBB have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBBB has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to VNLA (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNLA dropped -4.49% vs JBBB's -10.57%.

On 3-year performance, JBBB leads with 10.60% vs 5.78% for VNLA. On fees, VNLA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JBBB has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 5.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNLA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 4.78% for VNLA.

VNLA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while JBBB is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for VNLA and 0.49% for JBBB.

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.55 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNLA and JBBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer