VNLA vs. BABO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VNLA (Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF) and BABO (YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNLA is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while BABO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. VNLA is passively managed, while BABO is actively managed. Over the past year, VNLA returned 4.77% vs -1.50% for BABO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNLA charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BABO.

Performance

VNLA vs. BABO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNLA achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than BABO's -20.64% return.

VNLA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 1.85%
• 1Y: 4.77%
• 3Y*: 5.79%
• 5Y*: 3.83%
• 10Y*: —

BABO

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -16.79%
• YTD: -20.64%
• 6M: -24.20%
• 1Y: -1.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNLA vs. BABO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF	1.59%	5.45%	2.65%
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	-20.64%	46.84%	0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VNLA and BABO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024	0.15

Return for Risk

VNLA vs. BABO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNLA

VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 99
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BABO

BABO Risk / Return Rank: 8
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNLA vs. BABO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VNLA	BABO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.54	-0.12	+7.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	15.49	0.08	+15.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.56	1.01	+2.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.10	-0.13	+11.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	57.09	-0.28	+57.37

VNLA vs. BABO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNLA Sharpe Ratio is 7.54, which is higher than the BABO Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNLA and BABO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VNLA vs. BABO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNLA drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum BABO drawdown of -33.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNLA and BABO.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNLA	BABO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	-33.33%	+28.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.43%	-33.33%	+32.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-33.33%	+33.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-13.90%	+13.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	15.34%	-15.26%

Volatility

VNLA vs. BABO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is 0.15%, while YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that VNLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNLA	BABO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.15%	8.72%	-8.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.46%	24.44%	-23.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63%	35.33%	-34.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.04%	36.67%	-35.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.42%	36.67%	-35.25%

VNLA vs. BABO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNLA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BABO's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

VNLA vs. BABO - Dividend Comparison

VNLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than BABO's 98.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	98.48%	85.50%	20.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF	4.77%	4.84%	4.97%	3.95%	4.35%	1.67%	1.21%	3.13%	2.43%	1.79%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNLA and BABO in my portfolio?

VNLA and BABO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VNLA or BABO?

BABO has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to VNLA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNLA dropped -4.49% vs BABO's -33.33%.

Which ETF is better, VNLA or BABO?

On 1-year performance, VNLA leads with 4.77% vs -1.50% for BABO. On fees, VNLA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VNLA or BABO?

Over the 1-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 4.77% return vs -1.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNLA or BABO?

VNLA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNLA or BABO?

BABO has the higher dividend yield at 98.48%, compared with 4.77% for VNLA.

What is the main difference between VNLA and BABO?

VNLA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BABO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for VNLA and 0.99% for BABO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.54 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.