PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNAM vs. JPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNAM vs. JPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNAM achieves a -4.11% return, which is significantly lower than JPEM's 8.89% return.


VNAM

1D
1.90%
1M
-4.51%
6M
-1.40%
YTD
-4.11%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-1.00%

JPEM

1D
0.44%
1M
3.68%
6M
2.65%
YTD
8.89%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
7.03%
ALL TIME*
5.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$758.35K$777.78K$1.09M
$333.97K$254.89K$282.03K

VNAM vs. JPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
-4.11%67.05%-7.78%12.95%-44.16%2.41%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
8.89%22.90%4.23%11.01%-9.03%0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VNAM and JPEM is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.25

The correlation between VNAM and JPEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNAM vs. JPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNAM
JPEM

Real Estate

32.9%
2.2%

Financial Services

29.8%
20.2%

Industrials

13.2%
12.6%

Basic Materials

8.6%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
8.6%

Technology

4.3%
6.2%

Energy

2.9%
7.0%

Utilities

0.9%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
10.6%

Communication Services

-

8.2%

Healthcare

-

3.9%

Real Estate

VNAM
32.9%
JPEM
2.2%

Financial Services

VNAM
29.8%
JPEM
20.2%

Industrials

VNAM
13.2%
JPEM
12.6%

Basic Materials

VNAM
8.6%
JPEM
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

VNAM
6.6%
JPEM
8.6%

Technology

VNAM
4.3%
JPEM
6.2%

Energy

VNAM
2.9%
JPEM
7.0%

Utilities

VNAM
0.9%
JPEM
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VNAM
0.8%
JPEM
10.6%

Communication Services

VNAM

-

JPEM
8.2%

Healthcare

VNAM

-

JPEM
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNAM vs. JPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VNAM
VNAM Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VNAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNAM Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VNAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNAM Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

JPEM
JPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VNAM vs. JPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNAMJPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.02

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.09

6.55

-3.46

VNAM vs. JPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the JPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNAM and JPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNAM vs. JPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNAM drawdown since its inception was -52.84%, which is greater than JPEM's maximum drawdown of -40.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNAM and JPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNAMJPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.84%

-40.22%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

-10.32%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

-14.30%

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.61%

-1.54%

-9.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.78%

-9.39%

-20.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

3.17%

+3.93%

Volatility

VNAM vs. JPEM - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) at 3.75%. This indicates that VNAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNAMJPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

3.75%

+4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.86%

11.97%

+7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.15%

13.80%

+13.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

13.58%

+11.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.57%

16.92%

+8.65%

VNAM vs. JPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNAM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than JPEM's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNAM vs. JPEM - Dividend Comparison

VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than JPEM's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.26%4.65%5.12%4.46%4.71%4.40%2.85%3.47%2.79%2.14%1.28%3.22%
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
0.51%0.50%1.00%0.49%1.04%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNAM and JPEM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNAM has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to JPEM (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNAM dropped -52.84% vs JPEM's -40.22%.

On 3-year performance, JPEM leads with 13.20% vs 10.02% for VNAM. On fees, JPEM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, JPEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JPEM has performed better with a 13.20% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPEM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for VNAM.

JPEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.51% for VNAM.

VNAM tracks MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index, while JPEM tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for VNAM and 0.44% for JPEM.

JPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNAM and JPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer