PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMVLX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMVLX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMVLX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMVLX achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 11.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VMVLX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 12.74%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.66% annualized return.


VMVLX

1D
0.83%
1M
5.00%
YTD
13.01%
6M
13.74%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
12.74%

FXAIX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.71%
6M
11.74%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
22.75%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
15.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMVLX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMVLX
Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
13.01%15.60%16.87%9.14%-1.21%25.92%2.48%25.71%-4.09%16.81%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
11.71%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VMVLX and FXAIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between VMVLX and FXAIX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMVLX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMVLX
VMVLX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VMVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMVLX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMVLX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMVLXFXAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

2.52

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.98

3.42

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

3.36

+0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.31

15.70

+0.61

VMVLX vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMVLX and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMVLXFXAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

2.52

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.85

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.87

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.82

-0.36

Drawdowns

VMVLX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMVLX drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMVLX and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMVLXFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.79%

-33.79%

-22.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.41%

-8.89%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.12%

-18.76%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.60%

-24.50%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.57%

-33.79%

-1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-3.79%

-3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.90%

-0.22%

Volatility

VMVLX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMVLX) is 2.62%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that VMVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMVLXFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.83%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

8.97%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

11.86%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

16.91%

-3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

18.07%

-1.60%

VMVLX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMVLX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMVLX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

VMVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than FXAIX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.03%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
VMVLX
Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.89%2.05%2.32%2.49%2.46%2.18%2.47%2.70%2.66%2.36%1.90%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMVLX and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXAIX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to VMVLX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMVLX dropped -55.79% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

VMVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMVLX and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer