PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMVLX vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMVLX vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMVLX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMVLX achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 13.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VMVLX having a 12.65% annualized return and MGV not far ahead at 12.81%.


VMVLX

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.40%
YTD
12.08%
6M
13.91%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
12.65%

MGV

1D
0.89%
1M
4.32%
YTD
13.05%
6M
14.92%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMVLX vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMVLX
Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
12.08%15.60%16.87%9.14%-1.21%25.92%2.48%25.71%-4.09%16.81%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
13.05%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VMVLX and MGV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.99

The correlation between VMVLX and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMVLX vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMVLX
VMVLX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VMVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMVLX vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMVLX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMVLXMGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.72

2.80

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

3.99

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

4.30

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.94

16.33

-0.39

VMVLX vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMVLX and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMVLXMGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

2.80

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.89

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.79

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.48

-0.01

Drawdowns

VMVLX vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMVLX drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, roughly equal to the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMVLX and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMVLXMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.79%

-55.87%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.41%

-6.42%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.12%

-13.18%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.60%

-16.54%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.57%

-35.41%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-7.70%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.68%

0.00%

Volatility

VMVLX vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMVLX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) have volatilities of 2.60% and 2.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMVLXMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.61%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

7.50%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

9.83%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

13.56%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

16.34%

+0.13%

VMVLX vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMVLX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMVLX vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

VMVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than MGV's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.89%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
VMVLX
Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.91%2.05%2.32%2.49%2.46%2.18%2.47%2.70%2.66%2.36%1.90%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VMVLX and MGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGV has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to VMVLX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMVLX dropped -55.79% vs MGV's -55.87%.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMVLX and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer