VMVAX vs. GTTMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VMVAX (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares) and GTTMX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VMVAX returned 10.94%/yr vs 12.67%/yr for GTTMX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VMVAX charges 0.07%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for GTTMX.

Performance

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VMVAX having a 11.66% return and GTTMX slightly higher at 12.24%. Over the past 10 years, VMVAX has underperformed GTTMX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while GTTMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.67% annualized return.

VMVAX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 11.66%
• 6M: 10.81%
• 1Y: 22.92%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: 9.41%
• 10Y*: 10.94%

GTTMX

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 10.84%
• 1Y: 26.90%
• 3Y*: 17.04%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 12.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VMVAX Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares	11.66%	12.06%	13.63%	10.12%	-7.89%	28.77%	2.45%	28.03%	-12.44%	17.04%
GTTMX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio	12.24%	18.40%	14.84%	9.39%	-13.90%	41.28%	5.12%	24.18%	-11.99%	22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between VMVAX and GTTMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2011	0.91

The correlation between VMVAX and GTTMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VMVAX vs. GTTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMVAX

VMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 65
VMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
VMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

GTTMX

GTTMX Risk / Return Rank: 60
GTTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GTTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GTTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GTTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GTTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VMVAX	GTTMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.86	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	2.54	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.31	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	4.34	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	14.38	-1.19

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the GTTMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMVAX and GTTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMVAX drawdown since its inception was -43.07%, smaller than the maximum GTTMX drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMVAX and GTTMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VMVAX	GTTMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.07%	-56.24%	+13.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-6.51%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.40%	-20.62%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.75%	-24.12%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.07%	-44.59%	+1.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-1.17%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-10.22%	+5.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.95%	-0.13%

Volatility

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) is 3.40%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that VMVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VMVAX	GTTMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	4.92%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.39%	11.48%	-3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.64%	15.24%	-3.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.99%	18.35%	-2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.80%	20.54%	-1.74%

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMVAX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTMX's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Dividend Comparison

VMVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than GTTMX's 16.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTTMX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio	16.79%	18.85%	14.45%	5.83%	0.40%	17.50%	11.58%	5.95%	9.88%	3.00%	0.55%	0.59%
VMVAX Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares	1.86%	2.10%	2.11%	2.26%	2.27%	1.78%	2.36%	2.08%	2.75%	1.86%	1.91%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VMVAX and GTTMX in my portfolio?

VMVAX and GTTMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VMVAX or GTTMX?

GTTMX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to VMVAX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMVAX dropped -43.07% vs GTTMX's -56.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.