PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMVAX vs. GTTMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMVAX achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than GTTMX's 13.29% return. Over the past 10 years, VMVAX has underperformed GTTMX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while GTTMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.36% annualized return.


VMVAX

1D
0.86%
1M
1.53%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.78%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
10.56%

GTTMX

1D
0.49%
1M
5.06%
YTD
13.29%
6M
15.08%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
10.95%12.06%13.63%10.12%-7.89%28.77%2.45%28.03%-12.44%17.04%
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
13.29%18.40%14.84%9.39%-13.90%41.28%5.12%24.18%-11.99%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between VMVAX and GTTMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011

0.91

The correlation between VMVAX and GTTMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMVAX vs. GTTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMVAX
VMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GTTMX
GTTMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GTTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMVAXGTTMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

2.04

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

2.81

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

4.64

-1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.13

15.63

-2.49

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the GTTMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMVAX and GTTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMVAXGTTMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.04

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.56

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.61

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.42

+0.28

Drawdowns

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMVAX drawdown since its inception was -43.07%, smaller than the maximum GTTMX drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMVAX and GTTMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMVAXGTTMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.07%

-56.24%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-6.51%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-20.62%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.75%

-24.12%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.07%

-44.59%

+1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-10.25%

+5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.92%

-0.10%

Volatility

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) is 2.65%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that VMVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMVAXGTTMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.96%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

10.84%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.41%

14.84%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

18.32%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

20.50%

-1.71%

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMVAX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTMX's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMVAX vs. GTTMX - Dividend Comparison

VMVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than GTTMX's 16.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
16.64%18.85%14.45%5.83%0.40%17.50%11.58%5.95%9.88%3.00%0.55%0.59%
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.87%2.10%2.11%2.26%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.08%2.75%1.86%1.91%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMVAX and GTTMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTTMX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to VMVAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMVAX dropped -43.07% vs GTTMX's -56.24%.

VMVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMVAX and GTTMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer