PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMRXX vs. JPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMRXX vs. JPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares (VMRXX) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMRXX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than JPUS's 10.87% return.


VMRXX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*

JPUS

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.86%
YTD
10.87%
6M
11.70%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMRXX vs. JPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VMRXX
Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares
1.50%4.25%3.45%4.65%0.00%0.01%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
10.87%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VMRXX and JPUS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.05

VMRXX vs. JPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMRXX
JPUS

Financial Services

17.8%
8.0%

Basic Materials

-

6.8%

Communication Services

-

4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

11.3%

Energy

-

7.3%

Healthcare

-

11.5%

Industrials

-

10.4%

Real Estate

-

10.5%

Technology

-

11.6%

Utilities

-

9.5%

Financial Services

VMRXX
17.8%
JPUS
8.0%

Basic Materials

VMRXX

-

JPUS
6.8%

Communication Services

VMRXX

-

JPUS
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VMRXX

-

JPUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VMRXX

-

JPUS
11.3%

Energy

VMRXX

-

JPUS
7.3%

Healthcare

VMRXX

-

JPUS
11.5%

Industrials

VMRXX

-

JPUS
10.4%

Real Estate

VMRXX

-

JPUS
10.5%

Technology

VMRXX

-

JPUS
11.6%

Utilities

VMRXX

-

JPUS
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMRXX vs. JPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMRXX

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMRXX vs. JPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares (VMRXX) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMRXXJPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

VMRXX vs. JPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMRXX Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the JPUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMRXX and JPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMRXXJPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67

1.92

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.77

0.65

+2.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.76

0.72

+2.04

Drawdowns

VMRXX vs. JPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMRXX drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum JPUS drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMRXX and JPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMRXXJPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-38.69%

+38.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

0.00%

-6.90%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

0.00%

-15.96%

+15.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

0.00%

-19.04%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.02%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.82%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

1.72%

-1.72%

Volatility

VMRXX vs. JPUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares (VMRXX) is 0.30%, while JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that VMRXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMRXXJPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

2.55%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.79%

7.61%

-6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12%

10.40%

-9.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.02%

14.51%

-13.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.02%

16.76%

-15.74%

VMRXX vs. JPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMRXX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than JPUS's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMRXX vs. JPUS - Dividend Comparison

VMRXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than JPUS's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
2.06%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%
VMRXX
Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares
3.88%4.15%3.38%4.54%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMRXX and JPUS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPUS has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to VMRXX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMRXX dropped 0.00% vs JPUS's -38.69%.

VMRXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMRXX and JPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer