VMOT vs. PTF
VMOT (Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF) and PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - VMOT tracks the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index while PTF tracks the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMOT returned 6.94%/yr vs 23.79%/yr for PTF. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMOT charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTF.
Performance
VMOT vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 77.58% return.
VMOT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 34.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- —
PTF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 19.05%
- YTD
- 77.58%
- 6M
- 74.93%
- 1Y
- 109.08%
- 3Y*
- 43.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.79%
- 10Y*
- 26.93%
VMOT vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 17.28% | 18.54% | 12.07% | -0.74% | -7.00% | 3.52% | 4.69% | 4.59% | -15.64% | 14.62% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 77.58% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 11.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMOT and PTF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between VMOT and PTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (5 years) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VMOT vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMOT
PTF
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
VMOT
PTF
Consumer Cyclical
VMOT
PTF
-
Technology
VMOT
PTF
Energy
VMOT
PTF
Consumer Defensive
VMOT
PTF
-
Healthcare
VMOT
PTF
-
Financial Services
VMOT
PTF
Communication Services
VMOT
PTF
Basic Materials
VMOT
PTF
-
Utilities
VMOT
PTF
-
Real Estate
VMOT
PTF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMOT vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
VMOT
PTF
VMOT vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMOT | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 6.10 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.42 | 24.27 | -10.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMOT | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.86 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.68 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.54 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
VMOT vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMOT | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.71% | -55.38% | +20.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -17.99% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -36.11% | +15.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.73% | -44.88% | +21.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -13.27% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 4.51% | -1.93% |
Volatility
VMOT vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) is 5.00%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that VMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMOT | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 13.27% | -8.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 29.47% | -16.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 38.39% | -23.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 34.95% | -19.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 32.94% | -18.04% |
VMOT vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMOT vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 1.75% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMOT and PTF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to VMOT (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs PTF's -55.38%.
On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 23.79% vs 6.94% for VMOT. On fees, PTF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, VMOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.79% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.
VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
VMOT tracks Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.60% for PTF.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMOT and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer