PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMOT vs. FWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VMOT vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VMOT vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
8.20%18.54%12.07%5.35%
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
6.18%32.00%29.23%25.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than FWD's 6.18% return.


VMOT

1D
1.90%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
8.20%
6M
13.04%
1Y
32.67%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*

FWD

1D
2.12%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
6.18%
6M
8.22%
1Y
56.74%
3Y*
29.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VMOT vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VMOT vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMOT
VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FWD
FWD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMOT vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMOTFWDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.97

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

2.59

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

4.27

-1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.98

14.34

-3.36

VMOT vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMOT and FWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMOTFWDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.97

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

1.28

-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between VMOT and FWD is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VMOT vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than FWD's 0.11% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
1.90%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
0.11%0.11%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VMOT vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than FWD's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and FWD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VMOTFWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-29.02%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-13.50%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

-6.71%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.55%

-4.23%

-9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

4.02%

-1.03%

Volatility

VMOT vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) is 7.71%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 10.91%. This indicates that VMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VMOTFWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

10.91%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

19.58%

-7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.91%

28.90%

-9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

24.64%

-8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

24.64%

-9.81%