PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMOT vs. CGDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VMOT vs. CGDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VMOT vs. CGDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
7.37%18.54%12.07%6.68%
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.66%22.74%11.52%9.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly higher than CGDG's 1.66% return.


VMOT

1D
-0.77%
1M
-2.58%
YTD
7.37%
6M
11.99%
1Y
30.23%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*

CGDG

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
1.66%
6M
4.53%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VMOT vs. CGDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDG's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VMOT vs. CGDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMOT
VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDG
CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMOT vs. CGDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMOTCGDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.31

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

1.87

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

1.91

+0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.49

8.55

+1.95

VMOT vs. CGDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the CGDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMOT and CGDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMOTCGDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.31

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

1.51

-1.22

Correlation

The correlation between VMOT and CGDG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VMOT vs. CGDG - Dividend Comparison

VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than CGDG's 1.94% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
1.91%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.94%1.95%2.15%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VMOT vs. CGDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than CGDG's maximum drawdown of -10.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and CGDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VMOTCGDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-10.52%

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-8.04%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-4.53%

-2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.54%

-1.29%

-12.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.21%

+0.81%

Volatility

VMOT vs. CGDG - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) at 4.62%. This indicates that VMOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VMOTCGDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

4.62%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

8.28%

+3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

14.10%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

12.21%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

12.21%

+2.62%