PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMO vs. MLPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMO vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust (VMO) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMO achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than MLPA's 18.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VMO has underperformed MLPA with an annualized return of 1.96%, while MLPA has yielded a comparatively higher 6.12% annualized return.


VMO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.77%
6M
5.19%
YTD
7.64%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
1.96%

MLPA

1D
1.35%
1M
5.69%
6M
13.90%
YTD
18.84%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMO vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMO
Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust
7.64%6.57%7.73%1.54%-24.29%12.95%8.89%16.23%-4.54%3.05%
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
18.84%5.73%20.35%15.93%27.03%39.64%-33.97%11.91%-15.71%-8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VMO and MLPA is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2012

0.11

The correlation between VMO and MLPA shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMO vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMO
VMO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPA
MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMO vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust (VMO) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMOMLPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.36

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

6.17

+5.31

VMO vs. MLPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the MLPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMO and MLPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMO vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMO drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMO and MLPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMOMLPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-78.75%

+28.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-8.33%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-14.20%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.70%

-18.75%

-18.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.70%

-74.05%

+36.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-1.55%

-3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-20.14%

+10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

3.18%

-1.61%

Volatility

VMO vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust (VMO) is 2.36%, while Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that VMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMOMLPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

5.09%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.01%

9.52%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

12.54%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.55%

17.99%

-6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

27.40%

-14.77%

Dividends

VMO vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

VMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than MLPA's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.11%7.82%7.25%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.84%9.09%10.00%8.05%7.15%9.29%
VMO
Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust
7.62%7.84%6.44%4.47%5.69%4.64%4.66%4.94%5.95%5.98%6.73%6.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMO and MLPA have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPA has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to VMO (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMO dropped -50.11% vs MLPA's -78.75%.

VMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMO and MLPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer