PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMNIX vs. FFGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMNIX vs. FFGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMNIX achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly lower than FFGCX's 21.14% return. Over the past 10 years, VMNIX has underperformed FFGCX with an annualized return of 5.48%, while FFGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.


VMNIX

1D
0.50%
1M
3.24%
6M
17.36%
YTD
16.69%
1Y
25.36%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
5.48%
ALL TIME*
2.84%

FFGCX

1D
1.15%
1M
7.49%
6M
7.74%
YTD
21.14%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
12.44%
ALL TIME*
7.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VMNIX vs. FFGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMNIX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
16.69%9.36%5.84%12.33%13.47%23.39%-11.58%-9.48%0.66%-4.83%
FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
21.14%28.66%2.98%-5.18%20.69%26.08%6.04%17.82%-13.21%17.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VMNIX and FFGCX is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2009

0.01

The correlation between VMNIX and FFGCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (3 years) to 0.10 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMNIX vs. FFGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMNIX
VMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGCX
FFGCX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FFGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMNIX vs. FFGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMNIXFFGCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.41

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.54

3.34

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.33

11.22

+7.11

VMNIX vs. FFGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMNIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the FFGCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMNIX and FFGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMNIX vs. FFGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMNIX drawdown since its inception was -27.90%, smaller than the maximum FFGCX drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMNIX and FFGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMNIXFFGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.90%

-57.23%

+29.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-12.27%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.36%

-19.24%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.69%

-27.22%

+20.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.95%

-48.43%

+23.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.35%

+4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-19.25%

+10.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

3.65%

-2.25%

Volatility

VMNIX vs. FFGCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX) is 1.89%, while Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that VMNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMNIXFFGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

4.40%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.32%

13.81%

-8.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.67%

17.12%

-9.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.25%

21.26%

-14.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.45%

22.34%

-15.89%

VMNIX vs. FFGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMNIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGCX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMNIX vs. FFGCX - Dividend Comparison

VMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than FFGCX's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
2.09%2.53%2.62%2.01%1.84%3.39%1.61%2.98%2.22%0.36%1.53%2.86%
VMNIX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
3.06%3.59%5.67%5.15%0.78%0.20%0.86%3.23%1.00%1.16%0.45%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMNIX and FFGCX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFGCX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to VMNIX (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMNIX dropped -27.90% vs FFGCX's -57.23%.

VMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMNIX and FFGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer