PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMMSX vs. FPADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMMSX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMMSX achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 16.52% return. Over the past 10 years, VMMSX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 9.09%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.


VMMSX

1D
2.98%
1M
-0.35%
6M
3.08%
YTD
13.15%
1Y
32.23%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
9.09%
ALL TIME*
5.42%

FPADX

1D
3.98%
1M
-3.45%
6M
7.70%
YTD
16.52%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.35%
ALL TIME*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VMMSX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMMSX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund
13.15%35.68%5.91%10.58%-18.15%-1.40%15.79%21.42%-12.53%32.01%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
16.52%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%18.28%-14.65%35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VMMSX and FPADX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.96

The correlation between VMMSX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMMSX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMMSX
VMMSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VMMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VMMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMMSX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMMSXFPADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.34

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

7.44

-0.14

VMMSX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMMSX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMMSX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMMSX drawdown since its inception was -39.28%, roughly equal to the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMMSX and FPADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMMSXFPADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.28%

-39.16%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-13.83%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-16.09%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-34.43%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.82%

-39.16%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-10.40%

+3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-13.18%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

4.33%

-0.29%

Volatility

VMMSX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) is 6.75%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 9.49%. This indicates that VMMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMMSXFPADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

9.49%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.85%

20.91%

-4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

22.72%

-3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

18.12%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

18.25%

+0.25%

VMMSX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMMSX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMMSX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

VMMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than FPADX's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
2.02%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%
VMMSX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund
2.05%2.32%3.33%3.05%3.71%6.80%1.04%2.04%2.53%1.54%1.44%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VMMSX and FPADX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FPADX has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to VMMSX (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMMSX dropped -39.28% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

VMMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMMSX and FPADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer