VMLUX vs. VCRM
VMLUX (Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares) and VCRM (Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Vanguard. Over the past year, VMLUX returned 4.44% vs 8.18% for VCRM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMLUX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VCRM.
Performance
VMLUX vs. VCRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMLUX achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than VCRM's 1.95% return.
VMLUX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- 2.15%
VCRM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 8.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VMLUX vs. VCRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VMLUX Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares | 1.05% | 5.50% | 0.64% |
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.95% | 4.91% | -0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMLUX and VCRM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between VMLUX and VCRM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMLUX vs. VCRM — Risk / Return Rank
VMLUX
VCRM
VMLUX vs. VCRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VMLUX) and Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMLUX | VCRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.98 | 1.59 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 3.02 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.76 | 11.19 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMLUX | VCRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 2.70 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 1.07 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
VMLUX vs. VCRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMLUX drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, which is greater than VCRM's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMLUX and VCRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMLUX | VCRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -4.12% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.53% | -2.72% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.26% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -1.13% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | 0.73% | -0.27% |
Volatility
VMLUX vs. VCRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VMLUX) is 0.46%, while Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that VMLUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMLUX | VCRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 0.98% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.15% | 2.17% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51% | 3.05% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.87% | 3.89% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.93% | 3.89% | -1.96% |
VMLUX vs. VCRM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMLUX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VCRM's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMLUX vs. VCRM - Dividend Comparison
VMLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than VCRM's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.64% | 3.42% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMLUX Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares | 3.16% | 3.85% | 3.38% | 2.39% | 1.64% | 1.04% | 1.70% | 2.10% | 1.89% | 1.65% | 1.62% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMLUX and VCRM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCRM has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to VMLUX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMLUX dropped -6.41% vs VCRM's -4.12%.
VMLUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMLUX and VCRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer