PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMLUX vs. NMTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMLUX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VMLUX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMLUX achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's 2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VMLUX has underperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 2.15%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.36% annualized return.


VMLUX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.41%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
2.15%

NMTRX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.88%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
2.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMLUX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMLUX
Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares
1.05%5.50%3.25%4.29%-2.90%0.23%3.38%4.21%1.64%2.13%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
2.47%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VMLUX and NMTRX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.65

The correlation between VMLUX and NMTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMLUX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMLUX
VMLUX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VMLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VMLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMLUX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VMLUX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMLUXNMTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.98

1.70

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.19

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.76

11.71

-1.96

VMLUX vs. NMTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMLUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the NMTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMLUX and NMTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMLUXNMTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

2.80

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

0.13

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

0.54

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

1.00

+0.48

Drawdowns

VMLUX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMLUX drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, smaller than the maximum NMTRX drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMLUX and NMTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMLUXNMTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-16.36%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-2.65%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.02%

-5.77%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.60%

-16.36%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.41%

-16.36%

+9.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

0.00%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-2.91%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.72%

-0.26%

Volatility

VMLUX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VMLUX) is 0.46%, while Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that VMLUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMLUXNMTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

1.25%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.15%

2.26%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51%

3.03%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.87%

4.03%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.93%

4.40%

-2.47%

VMLUX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMLUX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMLUX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison

VMLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than NMTRX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.58%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%
VMLUX
Vanguard Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares
3.16%3.85%3.38%2.39%1.64%1.04%1.70%2.10%1.89%1.65%1.62%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMLUX and NMTRX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMTRX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to VMLUX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMLUX dropped -6.41% vs NMTRX's -16.36%.

VMLUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMLUX and NMTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer