VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L
VMIG.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating) and VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VMIG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while VWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMIG.L returned 3.38%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for VWRA.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMIG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRA.L.
Performance
VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VMIG.L is traded in GBP, while VWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMIG.L achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than VWRA.L's 12.10% return.
VMIG.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 5.18%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 14.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- —
VWRA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 29.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 5.18% | 12.85% | 7.41% | 8.08% | -17.25% | 16.12% | -4.72% | 11.91% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.05% | 13.73% | 19.70% | 16.17% | -8.37% | 19.58% | 12.78% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMIG.L and VWRA.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019 | 0.66 |
The correlation between VMIG.L and VWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Financial Services
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Real Estate
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Technology
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Basic Materials
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Defensive
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Communication Services
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Healthcare
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Utilities
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Energy
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
VMIG.L
VWRA.L
VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMIG.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.48 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 4.30 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 16.58 | -12.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMIG.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.52 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.89 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.76 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than VWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIG.L and VWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMIG.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -25.64% | -15.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -6.93% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.44% | -18.10% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -18.10% | -11.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -0.40% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -3.46% | -6.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 1.80% | +1.42% |
Volatility
VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMIG.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 3.77% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 9.25% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 11.83% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 14.06% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 16.05% | +1.26% |
VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMIG.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VMIG.L nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VMIG.L and VWRA.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VMIG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VMIG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.
VMIG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VWRA.L is Global Equities. VMIG.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMIG.L and 0.22% for VWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for VMIG.L and VWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer