PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Distributing (VUKE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMIG.L achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than VUKE.L's 5.46% return.


VMIG.L

1D
0.70%
1M
4.25%
YTD
5.18%
6M
7.41%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*

VUKE.L

1D
0.32%
1M
1.69%
YTD
5.46%
6M
7.94%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VMIG.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating
5.18%12.85%7.41%8.08%-17.25%16.12%-4.72%14.21%
VUKE.L
Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Distributing
5.46%26.19%9.55%7.05%5.29%17.69%-11.61%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VMIG.L and VUKE.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.73

The correlation between VMIG.L and VUKE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMIG.L
VUKE.L

Industrials

19.9%
13.7%

Financial Services

19.4%
24.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
4.7%

Real Estate

9.4%
0.9%

Technology

9.4%
0.8%

Basic Materials

6.6%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
13.9%

Communication Services

5.9%
2.6%

Healthcare

4.4%
13.6%

Utilities

3.0%
5.3%

Energy

2.5%
11.7%

Industrials

VMIG.L
19.9%
VUKE.L
13.7%

Financial Services

VMIG.L
19.4%
VUKE.L
24.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VMIG.L
13.3%
VUKE.L
4.7%

Real Estate

VMIG.L
9.4%
VUKE.L
0.9%

Technology

VMIG.L
9.4%
VUKE.L
0.8%

Basic Materials

VMIG.L
6.6%
VUKE.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

VMIG.L
6.1%
VUKE.L
13.9%

Communication Services

VMIG.L
5.9%
VUKE.L
2.6%

Healthcare

VMIG.L
4.4%
VUKE.L
13.6%

Utilities

VMIG.L
3.0%
VUKE.L
5.3%

Energy

VMIG.L
2.5%
VUKE.L
11.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMIG.L
VMIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VUKE.L
VUKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VUKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VUKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Distributing (VUKE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMIG.LVUKE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.40

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

7.95

-3.54

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the VUKE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMIG.L and VUKE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMIG.LVUKE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.95

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.93

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.58

-0.27

Drawdowns

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than VUKE.L's maximum drawdown of -34.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIG.L and VUKE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMIG.LVUKE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-34.27%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-8.71%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.44%

-12.83%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-12.83%

-16.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-4.19%

+3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-4.27%

-5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

2.64%

+0.58%

Volatility

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Distributing (VUKE.L) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMIG.LVUKE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.89%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

9.31%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

10.72%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

12.65%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

15.02%

+2.29%

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUKE.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMIG.L vs. VUKE.L - Dividend Comparison

VMIG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUKE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMIG.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUKE.L
Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Distributing
3.00%3.12%3.74%3.82%3.94%3.90%3.02%4.65%4.64%3.99%3.75%4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMIG.L and VUKE.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUKE.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUKE.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VMIG.L.

VMIG.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while VUKE.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMIG.L and 0.09% for VUKE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMIG.L and VUKE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer