VMID.L vs. XMCX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VMID.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing) and XMCX.L (Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, from Vanguard and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VMID.L returned 5.85%/yr vs 2.36%/yr for XMCX.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VMID.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XMCX.L.

Performance

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VMID.L is traded in GBP, while XMCX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMCX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMID.L achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than XMCX.L's 3.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VMID.L has outperformed XMCX.L with an annualized return of 5.85%, while XMCX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.36% annualized return.

VMID.L

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 5.14%
• 6M: 7.30%
• 1Y: 14.06%
• 3Y*: 10.30%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 5.85%

XMCX.L

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 3.83%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 9.84%
• 3Y*: 6.25%
• 5Y*: -0.20%
• 10Y*: 2.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing	5.14%	12.87%	7.42%	8.16%	-17.36%	16.04%	-4.93%	29.17%	-13.15%	17.24%
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D	3.83%	8.84%	3.42%	3.42%	-20.92%	14.63%	-8.73%	24.38%	-16.43%	14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VMID.L and XMCX.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014	0.96

The correlation between VMID.L and XMCX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VMID.L	XMCX.L
Industrials	19.9%	20.1%
Financial Services	19.4%	19.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	13.4%
Real Estate	9.4%	9.1%
Technology	9.4%	9.5%
Basic Materials	6.6%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	5.5%
Communication Services	5.9%	6.0%
Healthcare	4.4%	4.5%
Utilities	3.0%	3.1%
Energy	2.5%	2.6%

Return for Risk

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMID.L

VMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
VMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
VMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
VMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 32
VMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
VMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

XMCX.L

XMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
XMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
XMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
XMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VMID.L	XMCX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.80	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.23	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.15	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	0.83	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	2.78	+1.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMID.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the XMCX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMID.L and XMCX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VMID.L	XMCX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	0.80	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	-0.01	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.15	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.21	+0.18

Drawdowns

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMID.L drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum XMCX.L drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMID.L and XMCX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VMID.L	XMCX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.85%	-50.63%	+8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.55%	-11.95%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.97%	-18.45%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.51%	-32.61%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.85%	-41.35%	-0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-7.13%	+6.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.80%	-11.24%	+3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	3.55%	-0.32%

Volatility

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that VMID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMCX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VMID.L	XMCX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	3.58%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.23%	9.95%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.41%	12.38%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	15.15%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.53%	16.47%	+0.06%

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMID.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMCX.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VMID.L vs. XMCX.L - Dividend Comparison

VMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than XMCX.L's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing	3.65%	3.90%	3.30%	3.41%	3.30%	2.55%	2.08%	2.82%	3.59%	3.19%	3.08%	3.09%
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D	0.04%	0.04%	0.04%	0.03%	0.05%	0.01%	0.03%	0.03%	0.04%	0.03%	0.03%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VMID.L and XMCX.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, VMID.L and XMCX.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, VMID.L or XMCX.L?

On fees, VMID.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VMID.L or XMCX.L?

VMID.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XMCX.L.

What is the main difference between VMID.L and XMCX.L?

Both ETFs track FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMID.L and 0.15% for XMCX.L.