VMID.L vs. VUAG.L
VMID.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing) and VUAG.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VMID.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while VUAG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMID.L returned 3.36%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for VUAG.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMID.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAG.L.
Performance
VMID.L vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMID.L achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than VUAG.L's 10.56% return.
VMID.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
VUAG.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 10.46%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- —
VMID.L vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 5.14% | 12.87% | 7.42% | 8.16% | -17.36% | 16.04% | -4.93% | 14.30% |
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 10.56% | 9.36% | 27.33% | 19.67% | -8.88% | 30.97% | 201.05% | 9.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMID.L and VUAG.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.55 |
The correlation between VMID.L and VUAG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
VMID.L vs. VUAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Financial Services
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Real Estate
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Technology
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Basic Materials
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Consumer Defensive
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Communication Services
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Healthcare
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Utilities
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Energy
VMID.L
VUAG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMID.L vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VMID.L
VUAG.L
VMID.L vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMID.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.51 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 4.08 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 14.96 | -10.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMID.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.73 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 1.04 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.90 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
VMID.L vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMID.L drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than VUAG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMID.L and VUAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMID.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -25.61% | -16.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -7.11% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.97% | -20.88% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -20.88% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.22% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -3.51% | -4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 1.94% | +1.29% |
Volatility
VMID.L vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that VMID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMID.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 2.62% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 7.17% | +3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 10.62% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 14.32% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 36.09% | -19.56% |
VMID.L vs. VUAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMID.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMID.L vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison
VMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, while VUAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 3.65% | 3.90% | 3.30% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 2.55% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 3.59% | 3.19% | 3.08% | 3.09% |
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMID.L and VUAG.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VMID.L.
VMID.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VUAG.L is S&P 500. VMID.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMID.L and 0.07% for VUAG.L.
Find the right allocation for VMID.L and VUAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer