VMID.L vs. VHVG.L
VMID.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing) and VHVG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VMID.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while VHVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMID.L returned 3.36%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for VHVG.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMID.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VHVG.L.
Performance
VMID.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMID.L achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than VHVG.L's 11.81% return.
VMID.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
VHVG.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 29.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- —
VMID.L vs. VHVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 5.14% | 12.87% | 7.42% | 8.16% | -17.36% | 16.04% | -4.93% | 11.60% |
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc | 11.81% | 13.85% | 19.99% | 17.54% | -8.66% | 23.31% | 12.56% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMID.L and VHVG.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between VMID.L and VHVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
VMID.L vs. VHVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Financial Services
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Real Estate
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Technology
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Basic Materials
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Consumer Defensive
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Communication Services
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Healthcare
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Utilities
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Energy
VMID.L
VHVG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMID.L vs. VHVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VMID.L
VHVG.L
VMID.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMID.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.55 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 4.29 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 17.65 | -13.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMID.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.90 | -1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 1.03 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.89 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
VMID.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMID.L drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than VHVG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMID.L and VHVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMID.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -25.41% | -16.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -6.94% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.97% | -17.96% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -17.96% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.36% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -3.28% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 1.69% | +1.54% |
Volatility
VMID.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that VMID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMID.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 2.72% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 7.53% | +2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 10.27% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 12.97% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 15.06% | +1.47% |
VMID.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMID.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMID.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison
VMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, while VHVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 3.65% | 3.90% | 3.30% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 2.55% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 3.59% | 3.19% | 3.08% | 3.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMID.L and VHVG.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VMID.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VMID.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VHVG.L.
VMID.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VHVG.L is Global Equities. VMID.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMID.L and 0.12% for VHVG.L.
Find the right allocation for VMID.L and VHVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer