VMID.L vs. LCPE.L
VMID.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - VMID.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VMID.L returned 5.85%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VMID.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
VMID.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VMID.L is traded in GBP, while LCPE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LCPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMID.L achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, VMID.L has underperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 5.85%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.
VMID.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
VMID.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 5.14% | 12.87% | 7.42% | 8.16% | -17.36% | 16.04% | -4.93% | 29.17% | -13.15% | 17.24% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMID.L and LCPE.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.29 |
The correlation between VMID.L and LCPE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (10 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VMID.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Energy
Industrials
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
VMID.L
LCPE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Technology
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Communication Services
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
VMID.L
LCPE.L
-
Energy
VMID.L
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMID.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
VMID.L
LCPE.L
VMID.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMID.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.43 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 4.13 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 13.66 | -9.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMID.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.44 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 1.04 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 1.20 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.98 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
VMID.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMID.L drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMID.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMID.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -27.05% | -14.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -6.66% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.97% | -12.39% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -12.39% | -17.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | -27.05% | -14.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -2.71% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -3.52% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.02% | +1.21% |
Volatility
VMID.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) have volatilities of 3.80% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMID.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 3.81% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 8.48% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 11.29% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 17.74% | -2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 20.60% | -4.07% |
VMID.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMID.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMID.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
VMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, while LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 3.65% | 3.90% | 3.30% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 2.55% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 3.59% | 3.19% | 3.08% | 3.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMID.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VMID.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VMID.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
VMID.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMID.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for VMID.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer