VMGAX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMGAX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
VMGAX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Apr 3, 2008. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
VMGAX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VMGAX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMGAX Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | -14.31% | 20.73% | 32.98% | 51.57% | -33.55% | 28.50% | 41.02% | 37.54% | -2.86% | 29.49% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.79% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMGAX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -9.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VMGAX having a 16.40% annualized return and VONG not far ahead at 16.65%.
VMGAX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -14.31%
- 6M
- -12.02%
- 1Y
- 14.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 16.40%
VONG
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 18.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMGAX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VMGAX and VONG have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VMGAX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
VMGAX
VONG
VMGAX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMGAX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMGAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.16 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.55 | 4.00 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMGAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.58 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.80 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.84 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between VMGAX and VONG is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VMGAX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
VMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than VONG's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMGAX Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.42% | 0.36% | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.71% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.86% | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.44% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
VMGAX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMGAX drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMGAX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMGAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.97% | -32.72% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.78% | -16.23% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.03% | -32.72% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | -32.72% | -3.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.78% | -13.09% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -4.90% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 4.72% | -0.03% |
Volatility
VMGAX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMGAX) is 5.62%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that VMGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VMGAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 6.72% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 12.34% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.18% | 22.40% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 21.35% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 20.82% | +0.98% |