PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMFVX vs. NAMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMFVX vs. NAMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMFVX achieves a 13.52% return, which is significantly lower than NAMAX's 25.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VMFVX has underperformed NAMAX with an annualized return of 10.61%, while NAMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.


VMFVX

1D
0.11%
1M
1.00%
6M
9.03%
YTD
13.52%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
10.87%

NAMAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.47%
6M
19.86%
YTD
25.51%
1Y
37.74%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VMFVX vs. NAMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
13.52%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%
NAMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund
25.51%13.77%13.14%9.65%-9.33%32.28%6.90%31.56%-18.46%13.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VMFVX and NAMAX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.95

The correlation between VMFVX and NAMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMFVX vs. NAMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NAMAX
NAMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NAMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMFVX vs. NAMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMFVXNAMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

4.14

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

16.48

-9.65

VMFVX vs. NAMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the NAMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMFVX and NAMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMFVX vs. NAMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMFVX drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum NAMAX drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFVX and NAMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMFVXNAMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-60.44%

+14.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-8.49%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-20.90%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.46%

-20.90%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.79%

-43.24%

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-1.21%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-8.45%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.14%

+0.82%

Volatility

VMFVX vs. NAMAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) at 2.90%. This indicates that VMFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMFVXNAMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

2.90%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

10.79%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

14.17%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

17.97%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.81%

20.00%

+1.81%

VMFVX vs. NAMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NAMAX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMFVX vs. NAMAX - Dividend Comparison

VMFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than NAMAX's 5.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund
5.94%6.71%7.07%0.74%6.39%8.99%3.22%3.38%27.38%21.08%8.07%17.05%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.66%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMFVX and NAMAX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMFVX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to NAMAX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMFVX dropped -45.79% vs NAMAX's -60.44%.

NAMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMFVX and NAMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer