VMFVX vs. FLMVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX).
VMFVX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 2, 2010. FLMVX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Nov 13, 1997.
Performance
VMFVX vs. FLMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VMFVX vs. FLMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.00% | 7.57% | 10.59% | 16.49% | -7.03% | 30.54% | 3.68% | 26.18% | -11.90% | 12.27% |
FLMVX JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.16% | 5.17% | 27.75% | 11.38% | -8.11% | 29.89% | 0.36% | 26.67% | -11.66% | 13.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMFVX achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than FLMVX's 2.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VMFVX having a 10.07% annualized return and FLMVX not far behind at 9.84%.
VMFVX
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 12.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
FLMVX
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 9.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMFVX vs. FLMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FLMVX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VMFVX vs. FLMVX — Risk / Return Rank
VMFVX
FLMVX
VMFVX vs. FLMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMFVX | FLMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.59 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 0.95 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 0.89 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 3.78 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMFVX | FLMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.59 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.48 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between VMFVX and FLMVX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VMFVX vs. FLMVX - Dividend Comparison
VMFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than FLMVX's 20.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.86% | 1.88% | 1.81% | 1.58% | 2.04% | 1.81% | 2.48% | 1.94% | 2.01% | 1.56% | 1.42% | 1.73% |
FLMVX JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund | 20.71% | 21.16% | 23.25% | 6.10% | 11.73% | 14.98% | 7.73% | 5.20% | 8.30% | 2.71% | 7.04% | 6.69% |
Drawdowns
VMFVX vs. FLMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMFVX drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum FLMVX drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFVX and FLMVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMFVX | FLMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -54.72% | +8.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.52% | -11.82% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.46% | -25.59% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.79% | -43.06% | -2.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.59% | -5.51% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -6.48% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 2.77% | +1.07% |
Volatility
VMFVX vs. FLMVX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) at 4.42%. This indicates that VMFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VMFVX | FLMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 4.42% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.35% | 8.85% | +2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.59% | 16.53% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 19.40% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 20.44% | +1.44% |