PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMBS vs. VABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMBS vs. VABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMBS achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than VABS's 1.40% return.


VMBS

1D
0.04%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.70%
6M
1.11%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
1.36%

VABS

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.70%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
6.26%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMBS vs. VABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.70%8.36%1.70%5.34%-11.90%-1.30%
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
1.40%5.40%7.59%7.61%-5.24%0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VMBS and VABS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2021

0.66

The correlation between VMBS and VABS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMBS vs. VABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMBS
VMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VABS
VABS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VABS Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMBS vs. VABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMBSVABSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.44

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

4.10

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

10.57

-2.74

VMBS vs. VABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the VABS Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMBS and VABS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMBSVABSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.99

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

1.41

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.40

-0.94

Drawdowns

VMBS vs. VABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMBS drawdown since its inception was -17.47%, which is greater than VABS's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMBS and VABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMBSVABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-7.12%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-0.98%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.65%

-1.42%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-7.12%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-0.13%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-1.42%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.38%

+0.42%

Volatility

VMBS vs. VABS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) at 0.40%. This indicates that VMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VABS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMBSVABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

0.40%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

1.07%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

2.04%

+2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

2.30%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

2.24%

+3.16%

VMBS vs. VABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMBS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VABS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMBS vs. VABS - Dividend Comparison

VMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than VABS's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
5.18%4.94%5.05%4.13%2.47%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.18%4.20%3.94%3.31%2.35%1.02%2.01%2.77%2.72%2.16%2.10%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMBS and VABS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMBS has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to VABS (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMBS dropped -17.47% vs VABS's -7.12%.

On 5-year performance, VABS leads with 3.22% vs 0.49% for VMBS. On fees, VMBS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VABS has performed better with a 3.22% return vs 0.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VMBS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VABS.

VABS has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 4.18% for VMBS.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VMBS and 0.39% for VABS.

VABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMBS and VABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer