VMATX vs. VSDM
VMATX (Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund) and VSDM (Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Vanguard. Over the past year, VMATX returned 8.31% vs 4.92% for VSDM. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMATX charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VSDM.
Performance
VMATX vs. VSDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMATX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than VSDM's 1.29% return.
VMATX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 8.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
VSDM
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VMATX vs. VSDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VMATX Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | 1.83% | 4.96% | 0.36% |
VSDM Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.29% | 5.39% | -0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMATX and VSDM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between VMATX and VSDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMATX vs. VSDM — Risk / Return Rank
VMATX
VSDM
VMATX vs. VSDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund (VMATX) and Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VSDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMATX | VSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.91 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 3.38 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 11.92 | -2.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMATX | VSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 3.64 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 2.21 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
VMATX vs. VSDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMATX drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, which is greater than VSDM's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMATX and VSDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMATX | VSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.91% | -1.81% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.30% | -1.46% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.27% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -0.32% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.41% | +0.52% |
Volatility
VMATX vs. VSDM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund (VMATX) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VSDM) at 0.44%. This indicates that VMATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMATX | VSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 0.44% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 1.07% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17% | 1.36% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 1.95% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 1.95% | +2.70% |
VMATX vs. VSDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMATX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VSDM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMATX vs. VSDM - Dividend Comparison
VMATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than VSDM's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMATX Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | 3.61% | 4.46% | 3.98% | 3.06% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 3.22% | 3.63% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 3.55% | 3.22% |
VSDM Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.10% | 3.06% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMATX and VSDM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VMATX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to VSDM (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMATX dropped -15.91% vs VSDM's -1.81%.
VSDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMATX and VSDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer