VMATX vs. BND

In the year-to-date period, VMATX achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VMATX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 2.05%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.49% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VMATX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund (VMATX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current VMATX Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMATX and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

VMATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than BND's 3.75% yield.

The maximum VMATX drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMATX and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund (VMATX) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.72%. This indicates that VMATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.