PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLPIX vs. CSUIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLPIX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund (VLPIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLPIX achieves a 24.46% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, VLPIX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 12.48%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.


VLPIX

1D
1.48%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
24.46%
6M
24.86%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
28.35%
5Y*
22.19%
10Y*
12.48%

CSUIX

1D
0.67%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
11.20%
6M
10.93%
1Y
18.38%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLPIX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLPIX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund
24.46%3.49%41.45%11.99%30.81%44.75%-18.60%9.59%-17.20%-1.13%
CSUIX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
11.20%14.69%8.74%2.46%-4.89%16.60%-1.29%24.72%-5.52%18.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VLPIX and CSUIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2015

0.57

The correlation between VLPIX and CSUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLPIX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLPIX
VLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CSUIX
CSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLPIX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund (VLPIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLPIXCSUIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

3.20

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

10.21

+1.35

VLPIX vs. CSUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the CSUIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLPIX and CSUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLPIX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLPIX drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than CSUIX's maximum drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLPIX and CSUIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLPIXCSUIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.56%

-52.01%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-5.96%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-14.89%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.26%

-20.01%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.56%

-35.01%

-29.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-1.93%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-8.15%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

1.86%

+0.75%

Volatility

VLPIX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund (VLPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.47%. This indicates that VLPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLPIXCSUIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

3.47%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

7.90%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

9.87%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.10%

12.96%

+7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.62%

14.87%

+9.75%

VLPIX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLPIX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

VLPIX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison

VLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, more than CSUIX's 7.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSUIX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
7.56%8.41%2.58%2.53%3.91%3.25%1.64%1.83%2.45%5.12%2.35%6.52%
VLPIX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund
7.87%9.63%2.61%3.32%3.01%3.66%5.40%4.28%4.04%2.81%2.50%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLPIX and CSUIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLPIX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to CSUIX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLPIX dropped -64.56% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.

VLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLPIX and CSUIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer