VLLU vs. SMRI
VLLU (Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF) and SMRI (Bushido Capital US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. VLLU is passively managed, while SMRI is actively managed. Over the past year, VLLU returned 26.23% vs 38.05% for SMRI. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VLLU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for SMRI.
Performance
VLLU vs. SMRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLLU achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than SMRI's 18.77% return.
VLLU
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 14.80%
- 1Y
- 26.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMRI
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 11.36%
- YTD
- 18.77%
- 6M
- 20.14%
- 1Y
- 38.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VLLU vs. SMRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF | 11.14% | 17.35% | 2.68% |
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 18.77% | 17.41% | 7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLLU and SMRI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VLLU and SMRI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLLU vs. SMRI — Risk / Return Rank
VLLU
SMRI
VLLU vs. SMRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) and Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VLLU | SMRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 2.61 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.48 | 3.72 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 5.65 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.41 | 17.87 | -2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VLLU | SMRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.61 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 1.45 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
VLLU vs. SMRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLLU drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, smaller than the maximum SMRI drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLLU and SMRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLLU | SMRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.62% | -18.45% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -6.80% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.02% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -2.71% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 2.15% | -0.42% |
Volatility
VLLU vs. SMRI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) is 3.66%, while Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that VLLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLLU | SMRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 5.43% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 10.94% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01% | 14.63% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 15.85% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 15.85% | -0.99% |
VLLU vs. SMRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLLU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SMRI's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
VLLU vs. SMRI - Dividend Comparison
VLLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SMRI's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.32% | 0.98% | 0.45% |
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF | 1.37% | 1.52% | 0.90% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLLU and SMRI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMRI has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to VLLU (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLLU dropped -16.62% vs SMRI's -18.45%.
On 1-year performance, SMRI leads with 38.05% vs 26.23% for VLLU. On fees, VLLU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, VLLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMRI has performed better with a 38.05% return vs 26.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLLU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for SMRI.
VLLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.95% for SMRI.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Bushido. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VLLU and 0.71% for SMRI.
SMRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLLU and SMRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer