VLLU vs. IBTF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

VLLU (Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VLLU is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value Index, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VLLU returned 26.23% vs 2.14% for IBTF. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. VLLU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.

Performance

VLLU vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VLLU

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 5.60%
• YTD: 11.14%
• 6M: 14.80%
• 1Y: 26.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 2.14%
• 3Y*: 3.66%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLLU vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF	11.14%	17.35%	2.68%
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	3.81%	1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VLLU and IBTF is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	-0.03

Return for Risk

VLLU vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLLU

VLLU Risk / Return Rank: 74
VLLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VLLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
VLLU Omega Ratio Rank: 68
VLLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VLLU Martin Ratio Rank: 78

IBTF

IBTF Risk / Return Rank: 99
IBTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
IBTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
IBTF Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLLU vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VLLU	IBTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	7.08	-4.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	20.07	-16.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	6.23	-4.81
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	64.70	-60.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.41	219.02	-203.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VLLU vs. IBTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the IBTF Sharpe Ratio of 7.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLLU and IBTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VLLU	IBTF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	7.08	-4.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	0.44	+0.80

Drawdowns

VLLU vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLLU drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, which is greater than IBTF's maximum drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLLU and IBTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLLU	IBTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.62%	-10.45%	-6.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-0.04%	-6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-3.33%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	0.01%	+1.72%

Volatility

VLLU vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison

Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that VLLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLLU	IBTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	0.00%	+3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.21%	0.19%	+8.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.01%	0.36%	+10.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	2.38%	+12.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	2.56%	+12.30%

VLLU vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLLU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VLLU vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison

VLLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than IBTF's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	2.08%	3.83%	4.32%	4.03%	1.93%	0.57%	0.59%
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF	1.37%	1.52%	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLLU and IBTF in my portfolio?

VLLU and IBTF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VLLU or IBTF?

VLLU has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLLU dropped -16.62% vs IBTF's -10.45%.

Which ETF is better, VLLU or IBTF?

On 1-year performance, VLLU leads with 26.23% vs 2.14% for IBTF. On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VLLU or IBTF?

Over the 1-year period, VLLU has performed better with a 26.23% return vs 2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VLLU or IBTF?

IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VLLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VLLU or IBTF?

IBTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.37% for VLLU.

What is the main difference between VLLU and IBTF?

VLLU is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IBTF is Government Bonds. VLLU tracks Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value Index, while IBTF tracks ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VLLU and 0.07% for IBTF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.08 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.