PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLIFX vs. FSLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLIFX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLIFX achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 21.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VLIFX having a 11.64% annualized return and FSLSX not far behind at 11.42%.


VLIFX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.09%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
-2.29%
1Y
-1.86%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
11.64%

FSLSX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.49%
YTD
21.04%
6M
13.49%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLIFX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLIFX
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund
-1.36%0.79%7.59%22.11%-9.60%19.76%19.96%35.30%4.65%19.85%
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
21.04%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%33.32%8.24%34.54%-16.90%17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VLIFX and FSLSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1984

0.78

The correlation between VLIFX and FSLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLIFX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLIFX
VLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLIFX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLIFXFSLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.32

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

3.32

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

10.82

-11.14

VLIFX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLIFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLIFX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLIFXFSLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

1.73

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.45

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.52

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.54

-0.15

Drawdowns

VLIFX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLIFX drawdown since its inception was -61.48%, smaller than the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLIFX and FSLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLIFXFSLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.48%

-69.87%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-9.79%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-26.81%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.91%

-26.81%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-47.98%

+12.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.74%

0.00%

-8.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.66%

-8.28%

-7.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

2.99%

+1.16%

Volatility

VLIFX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX) is 3.71%, while Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that VLIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLIFXFSLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

4.27%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

14.50%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

18.78%

-5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

20.50%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

21.92%

-4.06%

VLIFX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLIFX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

VLIFX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

VLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%
VLIFX
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund
2.19%2.16%0.99%0.03%7.22%8.23%7.81%1.42%5.12%1.61%2.24%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLIFX and FSLSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLSX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to VLIFX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLIFX dropped -61.48% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

FSLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLIFX and FSLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer