PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLGSX vs. FNBGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLGSX vs. FNBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLGSX) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLGSX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than FNBGX's 0.02% return.


VLGSX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
-1.36%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
-0.48%
5Y*
-4.95%
10Y*
-1.06%

FNBGX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.23%
YTD
0.02%
6M
-1.23%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
-0.54%
5Y*
-5.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLGSX vs. FNBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLGSX
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares
-0.22%5.42%-6.17%3.66%-29.48%-4.99%17.70%14.31%-1.62%1.74%
FNBGX
Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.02%5.30%-6.18%3.20%-29.89%-5.17%17.58%14.24%-1.62%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VLGSX and FNBGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.99

The correlation between VLGSX and FNBGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLGSX vs. FNBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLGSX
VLGSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VLGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
VLGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FNBGX
FNBGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FNBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FNBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLGSX vs. FNBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLGSX) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLGSXFNBGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.78

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

2.06

-0.01

VLGSX vs. FNBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the FNBGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLGSX and FNBGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLGSXFNBGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.63

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

-0.35

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.07

+0.25

Drawdowns

VLGSX vs. FNBGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLGSX drawdown since its inception was -46.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FNBGX drawdown of -46.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLGSX and FNBGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLGSXFNBGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.22%

-46.86%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-7.28%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.67%

-17.66%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.02%

-41.54%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.45%

-37.24%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.12%

-21.65%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.74%

-0.06%

Volatility

VLGSX vs. FNBGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLGSX) is 2.64%, while Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that VLGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLGSXFNBGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.79%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.08%

6.13%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94%

9.03%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

14.59%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.71%

14.20%

-0.49%

VLGSX vs. FNBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLGSX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FNBGX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLGSX vs. FNBGX - Dividend Comparison

VLGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than FNBGX's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNBGX
Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
4.00%3.88%3.75%3.20%2.26%2.47%3.96%2.63%2.93%0.70%0.00%0.00%
VLGSX
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.57%4.41%4.65%3.30%2.80%1.85%2.13%2.45%2.72%2.55%2.46%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VLGSX and FNBGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNBGX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to VLGSX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLGSX dropped -46.22% vs FNBGX's -46.86%.

FNBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLGSX and FNBGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer