PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLGIX vs. FUTBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLGIX vs. FUTBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares (VLGIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLGIX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than FUTBX's 0.07% return.


VLGIX

1D
0.17%
1M
1.13%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
-0.45%
5Y*
-4.92%
10Y*
-1.03%

FUTBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.07%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLGIX vs. FUTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLGIX
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares
-0.22%5.46%-6.11%3.67%-29.45%-5.06%17.72%14.31%-1.59%8.36%
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.07%6.12%0.70%4.19%-13.00%-2.54%7.76%7.30%0.95%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VLGIX and FUTBX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.93

The correlation between VLGIX and FUTBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLGIX vs. FUTBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLGIX
VLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
VLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTBX
FUTBX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FUTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLGIX vs. FUTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares (VLGIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLGIXFUTBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.18

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.28

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

3.75

-1.69

VLGIX vs. FUTBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the FUTBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLGIX and FUTBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLGIXFUTBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.02

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

-0.07

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.25

-0.06

Drawdowns

VLGIX vs. FUTBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLGIX drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than FUTBX's maximum drawdown of -19.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLGIX and FUTBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLGIXFUTBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-19.69%

-26.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-3.09%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-5.42%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.00%

-17.03%

-23.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.41%

-7.62%

-28.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-6.96%

-8.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.05%

+1.63%

Volatility

VLGIX vs. FUTBX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares (VLGIX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) at 1.20%. This indicates that VLGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLGIXFUTBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

1.20%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

2.72%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.98%

3.87%

+5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

5.81%

+8.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

5.15%

+8.57%

VLGIX vs. FUTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLGIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTBX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLGIX vs. FUTBX - Dividend Comparison

VLGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than FUTBX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.65%3.43%2.90%2.12%1.12%0.86%4.54%2.75%2.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%
VLGIX
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.59%4.43%4.67%3.31%2.83%1.78%2.15%2.46%2.73%2.57%2.70%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLGIX and FUTBX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLGIX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FUTBX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLGIX dropped -46.23% vs FUTBX's -19.69%.

FUTBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLGIX and FUTBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer