PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLGIX vs. VBLLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLGIX vs. VBLLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares (VLGIX) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLGIX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than VBLLX's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, VLGIX has underperformed VBLLX with an annualized return of -1.18%, while VBLLX has yielded a comparatively higher 0.75% annualized return.


VLGIX

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.96%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.20%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
-0.66%
5Y*
-5.52%
10Y*
-1.18%

VBLLX

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.69%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.57%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
1.61%
5Y*
-3.83%
10Y*
0.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLGIX vs. VBLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLGIX
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.12%5.46%-6.11%3.67%-29.45%-5.06%17.72%14.31%-1.59%8.64%
VBLLX
Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.27%6.60%-4.12%7.13%-27.20%-3.08%16.27%19.15%-4.71%10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VLGIX and VBLLX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

0.98

The correlation between VLGIX and VBLLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLGIX vs. VBLLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLGIX
VLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
VLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

VBLLX
VBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLGIX vs. VBLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares (VLGIX) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLGIXVBLLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.12

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.91

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.53

2.27

-0.74

VLGIX vs. VBLLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the VBLLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLGIX and VBLLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLGIX vs. VBLLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLGIX drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than VBLLX's maximum drawdown of -38.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLGIX and VBLLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLGIXVBLLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-38.42%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-5.98%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-14.90%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.00%

-36.29%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

-38.42%

-7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.19%

-24.66%

-11.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.09%

-9.24%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.40%

+0.42%

Volatility

VLGIX vs. VBLLX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares (VLGIX) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) have volatilities of 2.14% and 2.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLGIXVBLLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

2.08%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.14%

5.88%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69%

8.11%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

12.86%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

11.59%

+2.13%

VLGIX vs. VBLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VLGIX and VBLLX have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLGIX vs. VBLLX - Dividend Comparison

VLGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than VBLLX's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBLLX
Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.78%4.66%4.64%3.75%4.16%2.89%5.84%3.62%3.82%3.69%4.19%4.98%
VLGIX
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.57%4.43%4.67%3.31%2.83%1.78%2.15%2.46%2.73%2.57%2.70%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VLGIX and VBLLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VLGIX has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to VBLLX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLGIX dropped -46.23% vs VBLLX's -38.42%.

VBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLGIX and VBLLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer