VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L
VJPU.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) and SJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - VJPU.L tracks the FTSE Japan (USD Hedged) while SJPA.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VJPU.L returned 29.41%/yr vs 18.62%/yr for SJPA.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VJPU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SJPA.L.
Performance
VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VJPU.L is traded in USD, while SJPA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SJPA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VJPU.L achieves a 19.64% return, which is significantly higher than SJPA.L's 16.02% return.
VJPU.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 19.64%
- 6M
- 21.88%
- 1Y
- 53.34%
- 3Y*
- 29.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 16.02%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 32.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPU.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 19.64% | 31.52% | 23.80% | 35.64% | 1.68% |
SJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 16.02% | 27.11% | 6.55% | 18.71% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPU.L and SJPA.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between VJPU.L and SJPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Technology
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Financial Services
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Consumer Cyclical
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Communication Services
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Healthcare
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Basic Materials
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Consumer Defensive
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Real Estate
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Utilities
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Energy
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
VJPU.L
SJPA.L
VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPU.L | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.32 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | 2.59 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.73 | 8.80 | +10.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPU.L | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 1.68 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 0.47 | +1.02 |
Drawdowns
VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, smaller than the maximum SJPA.L drawdown of -32.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPU.L and SJPA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPU.L | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.40% | -32.52% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -12.53% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.40% | -14.25% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.05% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -8.31% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.70% | -1.00% |
Volatility
VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) is 3.82%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that VJPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SJPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPU.L | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 4.33% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 15.69% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.86% | 19.38% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 17.52% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 16.76% | +2.69% |
VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SJPA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VJPU.L vs. SJPA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VJPU.L nor SJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VJPU.L and SJPA.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.
VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged), while SJPA.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VJPU.L and 0.15% for SJPA.L.
Find the right allocation for VJPU.L and SJPA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer