SJPA.L vs. N1ES.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE).
SJPA.L and N1ES.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SJPA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. N1ES.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100® ESG. It was launched on Oct 25, 2021. Both SJPA.L and N1ES.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SJPA.L or N1ES.DE.
Key characteristics
| SJPA.L | N1ES.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.58% | 30.44% |
| 1Y Return | 12.00% | 38.13% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.98% | 13.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.79 | 2.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.12 | 2.77 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.98 | 2.57 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.86 | 8.33 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.21% | 4.32% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.16% | 17.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.73% | -33.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.77% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJPA.L and N1ES.DE is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SJPA.L vs. N1ES.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SJPA.L achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than N1ES.DE's 30.44% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SJPA.L vs. N1ES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SJPA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than N1ES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SJPA.L vs. N1ES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SJPA.L vs. N1ES.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SJPA.L nor N1ES.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SJPA.L vs. N1ES.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.73%, smaller than the maximum N1ES.DE drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJPA.L and N1ES.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SJPA.L vs. N1ES.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) is 4.40%, while Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that SJPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than N1ES.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.