VJPN.L vs. S400.L
VJPN.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and S400.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Vanguard and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VJPN.L returned 11.10%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for S400.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VJPN.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for S400.L.
Performance
VJPN.L vs. S400.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VJPN.L is traded in GBP, while S400.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S400.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VJPN.L achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than S400.L's 15.40% return. Over the past 10 years, VJPN.L has outperformed S400.L with an annualized return of 11.10%, while S400.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.95% annualized return.
VJPN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 35.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
S400.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 31.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
VJPN.L vs. S400.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 16.32% | 18.86% | 9.05% | 14.00% | -5.70% | 2.26% | 12.84% | 14.56% | -8.37% | 14.72% |
S400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF | 15.40% | 17.62% | 8.31% | 13.66% | -5.83% | 0.91% | 12.00% | 14.33% | -9.33% | 13.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPN.L and S400.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2014 | 0.98 |
The correlation between VJPN.L and S400.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VJPN.L vs. S400.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPN.L
S400.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VJPN.L
S400.L
Technology
VJPN.L
S400.L
Financial Services
VJPN.L
S400.L
Consumer Cyclical
VJPN.L
S400.L
Communication Services
VJPN.L
S400.L
Healthcare
VJPN.L
S400.L
Basic Materials
VJPN.L
S400.L
Consumer Defensive
VJPN.L
S400.L
Real Estate
VJPN.L
S400.L
Utilities
VJPN.L
S400.L
Energy
VJPN.L
S400.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPN.L vs. S400.L — Risk / Return Rank
VJPN.L
S400.L
VJPN.L vs. S400.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPN.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.03 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 9.75 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPN.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.83 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.65 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.63 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
VJPN.L vs. S400.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPN.L drawdown since its inception was -25.19%, roughly equal to the maximum S400.L drawdown of -24.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPN.L and S400.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPN.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.19% | -24.69% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -10.45% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -12.83% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -19.34% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.19% | -24.69% | -0.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.43% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -5.13% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.25% | +0.04% |
Volatility
VJPN.L vs. S400.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) have volatilities of 3.85% and 3.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPN.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 3.99% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 14.23% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 17.33% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 15.38% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 15.80% | +0.10% |
VJPN.L vs. S400.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPN.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than S400.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VJPN.L vs. S400.L - Dividend Comparison
VJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while S400.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.23% | 2.54% | 2.47% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 1.94% | 2.04% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VJPN.L and S400.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VJPN.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPN.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for S400.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPN.L and 0.19% for S400.L.
Find the right allocation for VJPN.L and S400.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer