VJPN.L vs. FLJP
VJPN.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - VJPN.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPN.L returned 10.73%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for FLJP. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VJPN.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJP.
Performance
VJPN.L vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VJPN.L is traded in GBP, while FLJP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLJP values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VJPN.L having a 16.32% return and FLJP slightly higher at 17.05%.
VJPN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 35.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- 1Y
- 35.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- —
VJPN.L vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 16.32% | 18.86% | 9.05% | 14.00% | -5.70% | 2.26% | 12.84% | 14.56% | -8.37% | -0.03% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 17.05% | 17.76% | 8.86% | 14.00% | -6.65% | 1.95% | 12.36% | 14.46% | -8.91% | -0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPN.L and FLJP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VJPN.L and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
VJPN.L vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPN.L
FLJP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VJPN.L
FLJP
Technology
VJPN.L
FLJP
Financial Services
VJPN.L
FLJP
Consumer Cyclical
VJPN.L
FLJP
Communication Services
VJPN.L
FLJP
Healthcare
VJPN.L
FLJP
Basic Materials
VJPN.L
FLJP
Consumer Defensive
VJPN.L
FLJP
Real Estate
VJPN.L
FLJP
Utilities
VJPN.L
FLJP
Energy
VJPN.L
FLJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPN.L vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank
VJPN.L
FLJP
VJPN.L vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPN.L | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.14 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 11.44 | -1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPN.L | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.13 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.65 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.46 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
VJPN.L vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPN.L drawdown since its inception was -25.19%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJP drawdown of -24.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPN.L and FLJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPN.L | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.19% | -24.88% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -11.45% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -13.59% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -18.35% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -5.55% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.14% | +0.15% |
Volatility
VJPN.L vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) at 2.55%. This indicates that VJPN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPN.L | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 2.55% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 12.97% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 16.92% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 15.79% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 16.82% | -0.92% |
VJPN.L vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPN.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJP's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VJPN.L vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison
VJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than FLJP's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.56% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.23% | 2.54% | 2.47% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 1.94% | 2.04% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VJPN.L and FLJP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPN.L.
VJPN.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPN.L and 0.09% for FLJP.
Find the right allocation for VJPN.L and FLJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer