VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) and FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VJPB.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while FWRG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VJPB.L returned 33.91% vs 31.34% for FWRG.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VJPB.L is traded in GBP, while FWRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FWRG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPB.L achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than FWRG.L's 12.37% return.

VJPB.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 6.30%
• YTD: 16.20%
• 6M: 15.61%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: —

FWRG.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 12.37%
• 6M: 11.62%
• 1Y: 31.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	16.20%	17.98%	8.49%	5.20%
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	12.37%	5.73%	22.20%	7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPB.L and FWRG.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.44

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VJPB.L	FWRG.L
Industrials	26.6%	11.0%
Technology	17.4%	29.1%
Financial Services	15.9%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	9.4%
Communication Services	7.1%	8.9%
Healthcare	5.9%	7.6%
Basic Materials	4.3%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	5.0%
Real Estate	3.4%	1.9%
Utilities	1.3%	2.6%
Energy	1.0%	4.3%

Return for Risk

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPB.L

VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VJPB.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.46	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.23	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.44	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	4.66	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.23	12.24	-2.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPB.L and FWRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VJPB.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.46	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.10	-0.57

Drawdowns

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, which is greater than FWRG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and FWRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VJPB.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.65%	-22.64%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-6.70%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.07%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-4.29%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	2.55%	+0.76%

Volatility

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) at 3.51%. This indicates that VJPB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VJPB.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	3.51%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	9.17%	+5.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	12.70%	+5.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	14.75%	+0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.69%	14.75%	+1.94%

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VJPB.L and FWRG.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VJPB.L vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPB.L nor FWRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VJPB.L and FWRG.L in my portfolio?

VJPB.L and FWRG.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VJPB.L or FWRG.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VJPB.L or FWRG.L?

VJPB.L and FWRG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between VJPB.L and FWRG.L?

VJPB.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while FWRG.L is Global Equities. VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco.