VJPA.L vs. S400.L
VJPA.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Acc) and S400.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - VJPA.L tracks the FTSE Japan Index while S400.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPA.L returned 8.91%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for S400.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VJPA.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for S400.L.
Performance
VJPA.L vs. S400.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VJPA.L is traded in USD, while S400.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S400.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VJPA.L achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than S400.L's 15.12% return.
VJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
S400.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
VJPA.L vs. S400.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPA.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Acc | 15.94% | 26.79% | 6.72% | 20.04% | -16.20% | 0.35% | 16.08% | 4.51% |
S400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF | 15.12% | 26.49% | 6.51% | 19.66% | -15.90% | -0.00% | 15.44% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPA.L and S400.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VJPA.L and S400.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
VJPA.L vs. S400.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPA.L
S400.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VJPA.L
S400.L
Technology
VJPA.L
S400.L
Financial Services
VJPA.L
S400.L
Consumer Cyclical
VJPA.L
S400.L
Communication Services
VJPA.L
S400.L
Healthcare
VJPA.L
S400.L
Basic Materials
VJPA.L
S400.L
Consumer Defensive
VJPA.L
S400.L
Real Estate
VJPA.L
S400.L
Utilities
VJPA.L
S400.L
Energy
VJPA.L
S400.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPA.L vs. S400.L — Risk / Return Rank
VJPA.L
S400.L
VJPA.L vs. S400.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Acc (VJPA.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPA.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.50 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | 8.38 | +0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPA.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.59 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.47 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
VJPA.L vs. S400.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, roughly equal to the maximum S400.L drawdown of -32.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPA.L and S400.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPA.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -32.91% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -12.17% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.01% | -14.70% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.06% | -32.91% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.86% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -8.22% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 3.63% | +0.10% |
Volatility
VJPA.L vs. S400.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Acc (VJPA.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPA.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.55% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 15.51% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 19.10% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 17.60% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 16.90% | +1.85% |
VJPA.L vs. S400.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than S400.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VJPA.L vs. S400.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VJPA.L nor S400.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VJPA.L and S400.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for S400.L.
VJPA.L tracks FTSE Japan Index, while S400.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPA.L and 0.19% for S400.L.
Find the right allocation for VJPA.L and S400.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer