VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L
VJPA.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Acc) and IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - VJPA.L tracks the FTSE Japan Index while IJPH.L tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPA.L returned 8.91%/yr vs 19.18%/yr for IJPH.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VJPA.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for IJPH.L.
Performance
VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VJPA.L is traded in USD, while IJPH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IJPH.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VJPA.L achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly lower than IJPH.L's 19.62% return.
VJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
IJPH.L
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 19.62%
- 6M
- 22.58%
- 1Y
- 51.00%
- 3Y*
- 31.77%
- 5Y*
- 19.18%
- 10Y*
- 13.93%
VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPA.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Acc | 15.94% | 26.79% | 6.72% | 20.04% | -16.20% | 0.35% | 16.08% | 4.51% |
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 19.62% | 39.14% | 21.76% | 41.27% | -14.53% | 10.92% | 12.62% | 13.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPA.L and IJPH.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VJPA.L and IJPH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Technology
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Financial Services
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Consumer Cyclical
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Communication Services
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Healthcare
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Basic Materials
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Consumer Defensive
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Real Estate
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Utilities
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Energy
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L — Risk / Return Rank
VJPA.L
IJPH.L
VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Acc (VJPA.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPA.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.42 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 4.28 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | 15.45 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPA.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 2.32 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.87 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.60 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum IJPH.L drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPA.L and IJPH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPA.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -45.23% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -11.86% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.01% | -22.90% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.06% | -30.30% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.32% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -12.10% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 3.29% | +0.44% |
Volatility
VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Acc (VJPA.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPA.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.35% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 16.89% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 21.92% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 22.11% | -4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 22.74% | -3.99% |
VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPH.L's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
VJPA.L vs. IJPH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VJPA.L nor IJPH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VJPA.L and IJPH.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.
VJPA.L tracks FTSE Japan Index, while IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPA.L and 0.64% for IJPH.L.
Find the right allocation for VJPA.L and IJPH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer