VIXY vs. IWM
VIXY (ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIXY is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index Total Return, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIXY returned -47.13%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for IWM. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. VIXY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
VIXY vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXY achieves a -8.27% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, VIXY has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of -47.13%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.
VIXY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -15.15%
- YTD
- -8.27%
- 6M
- -22.71%
- 1Y
- -53.80%
- 3Y*
- -42.73%
- 5Y*
- -46.70%
- 10Y*
- -47.13%
IWM
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 39.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
VIXY vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXY ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | -8.27% | -43.05% | -27.43% | -72.74% | -24.98% | -72.40% | 10.54% | -67.81% | 66.78% | -72.78% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 17.07% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXY and IWM is -0.62, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2011 | -0.70 |
The correlation between VIXY and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.70 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXY vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
VIXY
IWM
VIXY vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIXY | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.34 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 3.56 | -4.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 12.64 | -13.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIXY | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | 2.05 | -3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.67 | 0.27 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.65 | 0.48 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | 0.37 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
VIXY vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXY drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXY and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXY | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -59.05% | -40.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.72% | -11.03% | -45.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.00% | -27.50% | -53.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.92% | -31.91% | -64.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.87% | -41.13% | -58.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -1.49% | -98.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.18% | -10.77% | -81.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.22% | 3.10% | +37.12% |
Volatility
VIXY vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.75%. This indicates that VIXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXY | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 5.75% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.47% | 13.53% | +27.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.89% | 19.20% | +36.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.31% | 22.52% | +47.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.48% | 23.04% | +49.44% |
VIXY vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIXY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIXY vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
VIXY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
VIXY ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXY and IWM have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIXY has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to IWM (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXY dropped -100.00% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.93% vs -47.13% for VIXY. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.93% return vs -47.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VIXY.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for VIXY.
VIXY is categorized as Volatility, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. VIXY tracks S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index Total Return, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProFund Advisors LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VIXY and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXY and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer