VIXM vs. NVDA
VIXM (ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF) is Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VIXM returned -11.68%/yr vs 66.52%/yr for NVDA. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
VIXM vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXM achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, VIXM has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of -11.68%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 66.52% annualized return.
VIXM
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- 6M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- -6.22%
- 1Y
- -14.41%
- 3Y*
- -10.10%
- 5Y*
- -14.31%
- 10Y*
- -11.68%
NVDA
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 67.12%
- 5Y*
- 62.14%
- 10Y*
- 66.52%
VIXM vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | -6.22% | 5.60% | -13.67% | -44.83% | -0.69% | -16.70% | 72.38% | -20.38% | 26.43% | -50.05% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 13.70% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXM and NVDA is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011 | -0.49 |
The correlation between VIXM and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.50 (5 years) to -0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXM vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
VIXM
NVDA
VIXM vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIXM | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.16 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 1.45 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | 3.13 | -4.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIXM vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXM drawdown since its inception was -96.23%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXM and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXM | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.23% | -89.72% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.16% | -20.21% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.26% | -36.88% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.40% | -66.34% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.55% | -66.34% | -6.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.07% | -10.05% | -86.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.60% | -36.11% | -45.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.30% | 9.38% | -0.08% |
Volatility
VIXM vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) is 3.38%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that VIXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXM | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 11.33% | -7.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.99% | 27.64% | -13.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 35.88% | -17.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 51.89% | -21.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.63% | 49.91% | -17.28% |
Dividends
VIXM vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
VIXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.13% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXM and NVDA have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to VIXM (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXM dropped -96.23% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXM and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer