PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIXM vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VIXM vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VIXM vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIXM
ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF
12.31%5.60%-13.67%-44.83%-0.69%-16.70%72.38%-20.38%26.43%-50.05%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
8.57%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIXM achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, VIXM has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -10.48%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.


VIXM

1D
-2.72%
1M
9.31%
YTD
12.31%
6M
8.41%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
-13.85%
5Y*
-12.86%
10Y*
-10.48%

GLD

1D
3.79%
1M
-11.05%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.05%
1Y
49.33%
3Y*
32.92%
5Y*
21.58%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VIXM vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIXM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VIXM vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIXM
VIXM Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VIXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIXM Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VIXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIXM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIXM vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIXMGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

1.79

-1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.64

2.21

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.68

-2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.54

9.90

-9.36

VIXM vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIXM Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIXM and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIXMGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

1.79

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

1.22

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.32

0.88

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.53

0.62

-1.16

Correlation

The correlation between VIXM and GLD is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

VIXM vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither VIXM nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VIXM vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIXM drawdown since its inception was -96.23%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXM and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VIXMGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.23%

-45.56%

-50.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.73%

-19.21%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.40%

-21.03%

-42.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.72%

-22.00%

-53.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.29%

-13.23%

-82.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.36%

-16.17%

-65.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.12%

5.20%

+10.92%

Volatility

VIXM vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) is 9.86%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that VIXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VIXMGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

11.06%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

24.30%

-9.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.79%

27.80%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.22%

17.74%

+13.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.06%

15.87%

+17.19%